Expenses expenses expenses

May 16, 2009 by dips1188

So, the release of UK MP’s expenses have rocked the political landscape unlike anything in recent years.

The fact that the expenses are varied and, in some cases involve a lot of money isn’t that surprising. I can see how an MP’s life can mean a lot of different types of expenses in the course of doing their job.

No, my problem is in the types of things that are being claimed. Second homes are, under certain circumstances acceptable but there seems to have been more than one case where this “perk” has been deliberately abused in order to increase the MP’s personal income.

I cannot see how expensive TV’s, Rugs and clearing a moat can, under any circumstances be claimed back.

In the working environments I have experienced, your claims for expenses have to be shown as a direct result of doing your job. They have to be backed up with suitable proof of purchase such as a receipt and have to be agreed by the company before payment.

So how does one claim an expensive rug as part of your role as an MP. Is an £8000 TV set a vital part of an MP’s function? More than that, why were these not questioned at the time?

Now, all the MP’s agree that the system is wrong but that wasn’t a complaint being made before these revelations.

In these times of credit crunch and cut backs this blatent waste of public funds is unforgivable.

Welcome

March 18, 2009 by dips1188

Hello and welcome to the Touchstone Solutions blog.

As business is multifaceted and diverse it requires a forum where information can be given, comments made, opinions expressed or just a place to rant and rave about a particular subject. Here we will do all that and more. From informative articles to personal comments we will try to cover all the issues affecting business both in the Costa Blanca region, Spain as a whole as well as the European perpective.

This week we are reproducing an article sent to us by Terry Tunmore of Crystal Finance. Terry provides a daily commentary covering a wide variety of subjects on business and the economy.

Thanks to the Bank it’s a crisis; in the eurozone it’s a total catastrophe

The Bank of England may have averted a catastrophe. If ever there was a time when this country needed its own monetary authorities – acting with wartime urgency – this is the moment.


Those nations with fossilised or timid central banks clinging to outdated ideologies are not so lucky. Even less lucky are those such as Spain and Ireland that have surrendered policy to a body that is deaf to their pleas and constitutionally obliged to ignore the welfare of their particular societies. They face crucifixion.

Spain’s agony is already well advanced. Industrial output has fallen 24pc. Some 352,000 people have lost their jobs in two months. BBVA expects unemployment to reach 20pc next year, touching 4.5m. Premier Jose Luis Zapatero can do nothing as long as Spain remains in monetary union. He cannot devalue to claw back 30pc in lost labour competitiveness against EMU’s German bloc, or take emergency steps to slow the property crash. In an odd lapse last week – perhaps a slip – he advised Spaniards that the best thing to do in these dark times was to ****.

Yes, it is dangerous for the Bank of England to buy up a third of all long-dated gilts. But it would be even more dangerous to allow deflation to run its course in an economy where debt levels have reached such extremes. Debt and deflation are a deadly mix.

The errors that led to our current predicament are well-known. A small army of economists – Austrians, Monetarists, and Keynesians – warned that central banks were playing with fire by fixing the price of credit too low and ignoring asset bubbles. The $6.7 trillion in reserve accumulation by China, Japan, and the petro-powers drove bond yields too low for safety.

Credit signals were gravely distorted. In Britain, Gordon Brown poured petrol on the fire by pushing the fiscal deficit to 3pc of GDP at the top of the cycle. Wretched man. However much we rage at Sir Fred or Citi-wrecker Chuck Prince, let us not forget that this crisis was confected by governments. To blame the free market is to miss the bigger point.
But I digress. We are now faced with the post-debt wreckage. The task at hand is to hold our societies together as best we can. One dreads to think what would have happened if the Hoover-Brüning nostalgics had succeeded in blocking every remedy.

As it is we have seen industrial production collapse in every region. The drops in January were: Japan (-31pc), Korea (-26pc), Russia (-16pc), Brazil (-15pc), Italy (-14pc), Germany (-12pc). Falls that took two years from late 1929 have been compressed into five months.

Those who say this is nothing like the Great Depression are complacent. Household debt is higher today, and UK banks are in worse shape. (No bank of size failed in the British Empire during the slump). Britain’s economy contracted by 5.6pc from peak to trough in the early 1930s (Eichengreen). Some put the figure at nearer 8pc. We may surpass that this time.

America suffered worse. Real GDP fell 28pc. But the worst occurred in the second leg, after the heinous policy blunders of late 1931. Reading contemporary accounts, it is clear that hardly anybody – not even Keynes or Fisher – realised that the world was slipping into a depression during the first 18 months.

Nobel laureate Paul Krugman says the Fed has been as far behind the curve today as it was then, given the faster pace of collapse. It is bizarre that Ben Bernanke has not started to buy US Treasuries a full three months after he floated the idea, despite a yield rise of 80 basis points.

He has been stymied by the hawks. Kansas chief Thomas Hoenig said last week that the top priority is to drain liquidity before recovery later this year sets off inflation. Well, Mr Hoenig said last May that inflation psychology was gaining a hold “not seen since the 1970s and early 1980s” with a risk that inflation would become “embedded in the economy.” The price spike broke within weeks. If his model was wrong then, why is it right now?

As for the ECB, it has not reached the starting line. Jean-Claude Trichet insists that there is no danger of deflation in Europe. What is the weather like on his planet, asked Mr Krugman.The ECB has cut rates to 1.5pc, but since they need to be minus 1pc on the Taylor Rule, this leaves the breach as wide as ever. The Bundesbank is blocking any serious move towards quantitative easing. Given that Germany’s economy is imploding (Deutsche Bank sees 5pc contraction this year) one wonders if the Bundesbank would be less hawkish if the D-mark still existed. Even their hard-money brothers at Switzerland’s SNB are cash printers these days.

So has monetary policy in euroland been paralysed by squabbles at a calamitous moment, blighting every member state? Almost certainly.
I’ll take the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street any day, warts and all.

Crystal Finance provide a range of finacial services to Ex-Pat’s and are an accredited QROPS agency. For more information on their services check out the web site at www.crystal-fs.net.

Channel hopping mad

March 15, 2009 by dips1188

So, Simulsat has finally taken over the transmission from the old Telmicro but apart from the change of name – and fewer TV and radio channels for the same price – not much else has changed.

Now, I admit that I am no expert on satellite systems or microwave re-broadcast and I don’t know a heck of a lot about the company itself. As such I think I am fairly representative of the largest group, namely the clients. Those ordinary residents, owners and visitors who want to watch UK based TV but end up watching distroted, digitalised images or blank screens with the, now all too familiar “E48 No signal” or it’s alterntive “E58 Searching for signal”.

This blog is therefore aimed at those on the Costa Blanca regions where Simulsat signal is recieved – I hesitate to use the word “watched” -and who feel, as I do that there is lots of money being made for a less than satifactory service.

Over the next few weeks I will try to find out more about the company, legality and the system used in an attempt to discover why we have to put up with a poor service.

I am counting on you, the reader to help me fill in some blanks and to help educate the less knowledgable of us so if you have reliable information on any subject related the Simulsat or re-transmission services in general please leave a comment.

Oh, I am sure there will be differing opinions and some will blame badly tuned recievers, location issues etc. I am also sure that there will be those better off who will point out that they have dish the size of Goonhilly and can recieve everything from BBC to messages from Mars but that doesn’t help us, the less well off who have only our mesh ariels, coship decoders and strained eyesight from looking at a signal that seems to have gone through a kalidoscope.

Are you with me?